Hi Will. I was trying to digest what you were saying.
EDIT: I looked at the Fronius document again and it looks like this method is Rule 21 stuff. Yes, we are doing this but at the request of the utility which requires communication from the utility to the GT system with and/or without batteries. So looks like what you are talking about has the GT inverter sell back (or convert) reactive power rather than real power. OK, for the moment, on with what I posted earlier.....
I will be repeating what you said but sounds kind of like Australia has a slightly different system than I am familiar with because as you say, the string inverter (Fronius and others) will reduce their output as the AC line voltage goes above a pre-programmed value to try and regulate that AC voltage from going any higher. This is a good thing to make happen and is easy to do of course. SMOP -- Simple Matter Of Programming.
Usually how this works is that the off-grid battery based inverter (the reference) shifts its AC frequency upward by up to 1 or so Hz so that the grid-tie inverter can follow by reducing its output power proportionally. Then, if the battery based inverter is keeping track of time gained by the increase in frequency, it can later on, reduce the frequency slightly to make up for that time gain and the grid-tie inverter will not change its power level. This is what SMA did with their Sunny Island and the Sunny Boy string inverters. Then, some other companies followed their lead and shifted frequency or responded by changing power output. Doing it this way keeps the battery charging Absorb and Float voltages correct without having them go too high when excess power is available.
I am not sure if just having the grid-tie inverter drop its power level is the best thing to do all by itself because it wouldn't be optimum. BUT if adjustment of the GT inverter is good, it could help a lot. Just not the best situation.
We will only be making a small-ish GT inverter or two and I don't know if it has this feature programmed in but will forward this on to let them know what you have said.
Now the battery based inverter(s) should be able to do the frequency shift thing to tell the inverter to reduce power as well.
There is also Rule 21 and Rule 14H (Hawaii) that requires control of the GT utility connected inverters from the power companies if the system is connected to public power which we are also aware of and implementing on our new stuff... Although as far as the battery based inverters go, that will come a wee bit later.
Also the time it takes for one of those GT inverters to come back on is the typical 5 minute wait that is required by UL and IEEE 1547 here in the US.
The fact though that Australia has them reduce the power of the GT inverter when line voltage goes up is interesting.
You can also use dump loads to keep from going over-voltage as well but I would rather have the battery based inverter tell the GT inverters how to reduce their power level in some manner. I would prefer a separate method than shifting line frequency such as a cable connection or something like that.